Letter

In a February 21st Exeter News Letter article we learned that Alan Bailey, Jim Knight and 9 other residents filed a lawsuit against the Town of Exeter in regards to the amendments that were made to the citizen petition warrant articles at Deliberative Session on February 5th.

In their lawsuit, Bailey, Knight and others requested injunctive relief asking for a judge to reverse the amendments that were overwhelmingly supported and have the citizen petition articles appear on the ballot as they were originally submitted. Further, they asked for a judge to grant them “all of their costs including attorney’s fees”since the conduct of the citizens and officials of Exeter violated New Hampshire law and their constitutional rights. As if that weren’t enough, they also wanted a judge to specifically find that the actions of the citizens at Deliberative Session, the conduct of the moderator and the conduct of the Board of Selectmen was illegal and unconstitutional.

They filed their lawsuit in the Rockingham County Superior Court on February 17th. On February 23rd, Judge Kenneth R. McHugh issued a two-page order dismissing their “request for injunctive relief both temporarily and permanently.” In his ruling, Judge McHugh writes that “since its passage, SB-2 has had both positive and negative comments and criticism” however he acknowledges that the law does “give great power to those who attend the deliberative session.” Judge McHugh found that “if the citizens at deliberative session wish to adopt amended language that completely reverses the intent of those that crafted the warrant article in question, they are free to do so.”

You would think that is where the story would end. But less than twenty-four hours after the judge’s ruling, Mr. Bailey, Mr. Knight and the 9 other residents filed an “Ex Parte Motion for Reconsideration” to the Superior Court. In their motion, the plaintiff’s claim that the judge was wrong and that the court “overlooked” information that was relevant to their claims. The plaintiff’s continue their lawsuit in claiming that the actions of the citizens at Deliberative Session were “clearly illegal” and in violation of the new law signed by Governor Lynch on February 4th (the day before the meeting) regarding amendments to the subject matter of warrant articles. They have asked the Court to hold a hearing on the matter prior to the town vote on March 8th since “irreparable harm will come to the voters of the Town of Exeter” as a result of the actions at Deliberative Session.

The Court has granted their request for a hearing and it is scheduled for Friday, March 4th at 9:00AM in Courtroom 2 of the Rockingham County Superior Court on Route 125 in Brentwood. Let us not forget that the amendments in question were supported overwhelmingly at Deliberative Session. Article 17 was amended by a vote of 158-49. It appears that Mr. Bailey and Mr. Knight and their 9 co-plaintiffs believe that I was wrong to offer the amendment, that the 157 other people present that agreed with me were wrong for supporting it, that the Town Attorney was wrong in his opinion on the legality of the amendment, that the Moderator was wrong in accepting the amendment and now the judge was wrong in dismissing their lawsuit. Well, I believe that Judge McHugh got it right the first time in his order dated February 23rd where he wrote that the “will of the people at the deliberative session was to pass amendments to their petitioned articles that had the effect of negating the intent of those articles.”

Let’s let the will of the people stand.

Robert Aldrich

Exeter

5 comments

  1. I assume Mr. Bailey is referring to Judge McHugh. I agree the observations he shared in his original decision were very helpful.

  2. If it is once again voted down…..will the 11 people be responsible for the Town’s legal fees? It amazes me that they do not accept the “will of the people” when it is not in their favor.

  3. These people need to get a life and stop costing the taxpayers of Exeter even more money in real estate taxes. I’m so sick of seeing these same bunch of whiners on Channel 22. Please, please, please let the Selectmen of Exeter do their jobs. Maybe you constant complainers can get the underseved attention that you need on some type of reality show. Please stop the disruption Town business with your own personal agendas. What happened to the will of the people? It was convenient for you to use last year, but didn’t work this year…so now sue the Town!

    Thank you Bobby for stating it so eloquently.

  4. It would seem some have too much time on their plate. Rather than continue a court challenge go to the Legislature and clarify it for the future. Imagine if the energy that was found at the deleiberative session was present for the 3/8/11 election. There might even be a great turnout for the Selectman’s race.
    There are better issues to bring to the table such as the two large warrant articles that do not seem to be totally complete.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s