UPDATE 1/28/13 In light of concerns about a transport contract for the NH State Liquor Stores detailed in today’s Union Leader.


Hope you glance at the newspaper today and check out a few stories. The Governor of NH is making a few moves. I guess I understand why the new DOT head should not be an engineer but someone with a deep development background. Fish& Game goes to a fellow with experience in Marine construction. I am making my own conclusions on where NH is going. This is about the point when things begin to go awry, when things get chummy, clubby.

The Portsmouth Herald today also feels it necessary to mention ATA airlines( a charter airline) and Aloha(c’mon) as examples along with SKYBUS that succumbed to pressures in the market. No, sorry , Skybus was doomed from day one with a stupid model. Now we have the PDA and Mr. Dick Green still thinking about renovating the terminal! If a free airline won’t work who the heck would take the Portsmouth bet moving forward? We have an airport, Manchester. Why can’t anyone be honest on this one? This really is a case of why we need an Office of Inspector General in this State. The contracts are going to be flying soon on many fronts and along with that trouble.

I am simply pasting this as an example and don’t want to hear howls about Massachusetts! I can tell you I have some knowledge of this office and know how they operate. They are independent, by charter. They draw their own special investigators, and they are good. It’s necessary to keep an eye on things. I have brought this up before to significant players in NH and it’s always met with derision. Those things don’t happen here is the common reply. The Massachusetts IG has told me their job would be made easier with a cross border peer. You can imagine why this would be be helpful to both States.


Massachusetts Office of the Inspector General

Mission and History


The Office’s mission is to prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse in the expenditure of public funds. (M.G.L. c.12A) Preventing fraud, waste, and abuse before they happen is our principal objective. Toward that end we employ a three-part prevention strategy:

  • Timely intervention – that is, intervening in situations before fraud, waste, or abuse occurs. For example, the Office reviews every bill filed in each session of the General Court and, when appropriate, recommends amendments to help protect against fraud, waste, or abuse. The Office also provides assistance to public agencies. For example, the Office has provided technical assistance to the Central Artery/Third Harbor Tunnel Project when requested, and sometimes reviews requests for proposals or invitations for bids for major, complex procurements.
  • Dissemination of lessons learned – by letting jurisdictions know about issues that should be of interest to many public officials. For example, we distribute many of our reports to agencies that we think may be able to use the information, and we use our Procurement Bulletin to inform local officials about the results of our work in other jurisdictions.
  • Capacity building – involves providing training and technical assistance to public officials. The Massachusetts Certified Public Purchasing Official program, our procurement manual, and our Procurement Bulletin are examples of our capacity building efforts.

Detecting fraud, waste, and abuse when they do occur is important. The Office conducts civil and criminal investigations and works with the Massachusetts Attorney General, the U.S. Attorney, and district attorneys to prosecute cases of individual wrongdoing. In some cases the Office reports matters to the State Ethics Commission or agency heads. Investigative results are also considered for identification of opportunities to prevent similar problems from arising in the future.

Brief History

The Office was established in 1981 as the first statewide inspector general’s office in the country. It was created in the wake of a major construction procurement scandal. In 1980, the Special Commission Concerning State and County Buildings (usually referred to as the “Ward Commission” after its Chairman, John William Ward) released its final report on corruption in the award of state and county building projects. The Commission found that billions of dollars had been wasted on building projects. The 12-volume Ward Commission Report concluded that:

  • Corruption was a way of life in the Commonwealth.
  • Political influence, not professional performance, was the prime criterion in doing business with the state.
  • Shoddy work and debased standards were the norm.

Creation of the Office was seen as part of the solution, not just to the problem in public building contracting, but also to a more fundamental problem. The Commission noted that it was formed approximately one decade after the State Crime Commission completed its work in the mid-1960s. The Commission believed that periodic investigation by special commissions was not a good approach to dealing with problems:

If public life relies upon spasmodic outrage to create special commissions to correct the ills of public life, then public life is in dire shape, indeed. That is why the Special Commission created the Office of the Inspector General, to build the capacity for self-correction into government itself . . . . [Emphasis added.]

The Commission noted that the state did have an Attorney General and a State Auditor, but it found a “vast middle ground”. . .

between the ability to review all state transactions to a limited degree without the power to investigate [i.e., the Auditor], and the power to investigate allegations of fraud on a case-by-case basis [i.e., the Attorney General]. . . .

The Office was created by Chapter 388 of the Acts of 1980; its enabling statute is Chapter 12A of the General Laws. The Governor, State Auditor, and Attorney General appoint the Inspector General to a five-year term. The first Inspector General, Joseph R. Barresi, served two terms from 1981 to 1991. The second Inspector General, Robert A. Cerasoli, served two terms from 1991 to 2001. Gregory W. Sullivan was designated Acting Inspector General on June 29, 2001. Gregory W. Sullivan was sworn in as the third Inspector General on August 6, 2002.

[Massachusetts Inspector General’s Home Page]
[Massachusetts Home Page]

Revised August 7, 2002

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s